151,586 members
2,039,297 photos
5,413,876 comments
 

Califfoto's Fotothing

Browse.Upload
and share
your photos
Browse.Explore
our fantastic photo library
Friends.Make Friends
Join our community and have some fun
Photos 91 - 95 of 204
City Redwood California Underneath Califfoto Bayshores BayArea

322 views

©  EXIF
Sometimes the drought makes us see what is burried underneath ....

This tire was in the middle of the Bayshore in Redwood City, Ca.

I will be posting some shots with my Canon Rebel. For this one I used the Canon 75-300mm USM IS.
I am pretty happy with the f-stop, but still very frustrated with the softness ...
As usual, the exif info is under the comments button on my personal website.
All suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Califfoto from http://www.califfoto.com
Friends
More latest photos

Comments on this photo:

Feb 05 2006 19:59 GMT PhotoPro PRO
Looks so out of place!
Feb 05 2006 20:40 GMT Phoenix PRO
From a distance it could be one of 'Nessie's' relatives diving.
Feb 06 2006 08:44 GMT Katalak
Never go yo the beach if you have a spare tire hanging out!
hahahaha!!
Feb 06 2006 19:27 GMT Elly
From the thumbnail< I thought it was nessie too, but now I can see itis not her.
About the softness: most lenses are not at their best at their limit (I hope I say this correcly, in this case at 300mm)
Feb 06 2006 20:17 GMT Califfoto
I agree. But I thought that applies mostly to the aperture rather than the focal length. Do you agree?
Feb 06 2006 20:45 GMT Elly
With a aperture of 5.6 you don't have a long DOF, so if the object is not quit in the point of focus, you can have some softness, that you wouldn't have if you used a aperture of 16 for example (greater/longer DOF)
You can make some test: make the same picture with different AV and different mm and than compare them with eachother. But on what I've read on the internet it is caused by the end of the zoom.
Feb 06 2006 21:17 GMT Califfoto
Thanks Elly for your help. I agree. In fact, I intentionally chose the biggest aperture to reduce the DOF, and get the blurry effect on the background.
I have also used the bracketing that you mentioned in the past and still got a soft (as opposed to sharp) image. I looked at some reviews on www.fredmiranda.com and it appears that the opticals with this lens are really soft. I tried a lens from the Canon L-series and got a much sharper image: http://califoto.my-expressions.com/archives/2186_1665899495/114534
with almost no distortion at F2.5.
I am, however, still puzzled as to the reason that this "softness" happens very randomly. My guess would be that the optimal range with this zoom remains very tight ...
Feb 07 2006 06:38 GMT Elly
discussions on Dutch boards tells that sometimes you can have bad luck to achieve not the best example of a lens.
but a lens from the L-range must do the job, and especially a prime will be hard to beat (and is very expensive)
A friend of mine uses the same lens as you, but he wants to buy a 300mm L F4 IS USM, with a converter, but one has to pay triple the price of your lens.....
Feb 08 2006 18:45 GMT zeem
Good catch...
Feb 24 2006 08:56 GMT fey
Unique and woderful shot !!!!!!